If you’re building something with a unique look—a product with a clean shape, a fresh interface, or a design that just feels better than what’s out there—a design patent might be exactly what you need to protect it.
What Is an IDS and Why Should You Care?
Before we go deep into how design patents and IDS work together, you need a solid grasp of what an IDS actually is. Not the legal definition. Not the government-speak.
Just the real-world version of what this thing is and why it matters to you as a builder, founder, or product lead. The truth is, most startups and inventors overlook this step because it sounds like background paperwork.
But skipping it or handling it the wrong way can create serious issues later—even if you’re filing for a simple-looking design patent. Let’s break it down in clear terms.
IDS Is Not Optional, It’s Part of Your Legal Duty
An IDS is your way of telling the USPTO (the patent office) what you already know about similar inventions or designs out there. It’s a transparency thing.
The government isn’t going to punish you for knowing about other stuff. But they will expect you to be honest about it.
You’re legally required to tell them about anything relevant that you’re aware of—things like earlier patents, research papers, public articles, or even products that are already in the market.
It doesn’t matter if those things hurt or help your case. If you know about them, you have to disclose them. Period.
This isn’t just a checkbox task. Think of it as showing you’re playing fair. And if you don’t?
That can open the door to accusations of hiding information, which could later be used to cancel your patent—sometimes years after it’s been granted.
The Mistake Most Founders Make With IDS
A lot of founders hear “disclosure” and instantly get worried. The instinct is to share less, not more. You might think: “Why should I point out something that could make it harder to get my patent approved?”
Totally fair question. But that’s where the strategy flips.
Disclosing what you know actually protects you. The patent office isn’t asking you to do their homework for them. They just want to know you’re not hiding the ball.
And ironically, when you’re upfront, it often builds a stronger case for why your design is different or better.
Startups that play this smart use IDS as a way to draw a clear line between what came before and what they’ve created. You’re not just admitting what’s out there—you’re showing how you’ve moved the needle forward.
Why This Still Matters Even If You’re Filing a Design Patent
Here’s where things get tricky. Some founders assume IDS only applies to utility patents—those detailed, functional inventions with technical drawings and long claim sections. But that’s not true.
Even if you’re filing a design patent—which focuses purely on how something looks—you’re still required to file an IDS. The rules don’t give design patents a free pass.
If you’ve seen similar designs, if you’ve looked at competitor products, or if your design was shown in a pitch deck, catalog, or online post, and it’s out in the public already—you need to disclose that.
The design patent world moves faster and often feels more visual, but that doesn’t mean it’s casual. The duty to disclose still applies.
How IDS Filing Helps You Stay Ahead of Problems
Most patent rejections don’t happen because the idea is bad. They happen because something wasn’t clear, something wasn’t included, or the paperwork didn’t line up.
Filing an IDS early helps remove one big obstacle from your path. It shows you’ve done your homework and aren’t trying to sneak anything past the examiner.
That can speed up your review process, reduce back-and-forth, and make it less likely that your application hits unexpected delays.
It’s also an early way to flag potential issues you might want to clarify—like emphasizing the unique visual features in your design compared to what already exists.
It’s Easier to Do This Right When You Start Early
The best time to think about IDS isn’t after you’ve filed. It’s when you’re preparing your application. At this stage, you and your team are already thinking about what makes your design stand out.
That’s when you’ll naturally come across earlier designs or products you’re trying to improve on.
Capture that. Make a note. Keep a simple folder of links or files. If you’re using PowerPatent, you can drop those directly into the platform so your application is built with that info baked in.
You don’t have to overthink it—but you do have to stay consistent. Waiting until the last minute is when mistakes creep in.
IDS Isn’t Just About Compliance, It’s About Strategy
Here’s the mindset shift. Think of IDS not as a form, but as a strategic part of your patent story. Every item you disclose becomes part of the narrative—this is what existed, and here’s how your design breaks away from that.
If you’re clear and proactive, the examiner’s job gets easier. That means a smoother, faster process for you.
When handled right, IDS doesn’t weaken your case. It actually sharpens your edge.
How IDS Applies to Design Patents (Yes, It Still Does)
Many people think design patents are the “lightweight” version of a patent. Shorter. Simpler. Easier. And while it’s true they focus only on how something looks, not how it works, that doesn’t mean they’re free from rules.
One of the most common misunderstandings we see is around IDS: people assume it’s not required for design patents. But it is.
Every design patent still falls under the same duty of disclosure—and skipping this step can lead to serious risks, even if your design seems simple on the surface.
Design Patents Are Still Serious Legal Tools
Design patents protect the appearance of something—its shape, contours, surface details, and even the way elements are arranged.
That might sound less technical than a utility patent, but make no mistake: a design patent is still a legal right granted by the government. And just like any legal process, there are expectations you have to meet.
One of those expectations is honesty about what you already know.
If you’ve seen similar designs—whether it’s in a competitor’s product, a public brochure, a social media post, or another patent—you need to disclose that. Just because the subject matter feels “visual” doesn’t make it exempt.
Patent Examiners Still Search for Prior Art in Design Patents
When you file a design patent, a real human examiner at the USPTO will look through existing designs—other patents, published images, and anything else they can find—to determine if your design is new.
That’s called a prior art search.
But they don’t just rely on their own research. They also expect you to tell them what you already know about prior designs. This is where the IDS comes in.
If you’ve already seen something that looks similar, and you don’t disclose it, and the examiner finds it later—that’s a red flag.
Worse, if your patent gets approved and someone later proves you withheld something, they can challenge the patent’s validity in court.
That can happen years down the line, and it’s not fun to deal with.
Yes, Even Small Differences Matter—But They Need to Be Explained
Let’s say you’ve seen a design that looks 80% like yours. Maybe the shape is similar but the corners are different. Or maybe the overall layout is close, but the proportions are new.
You might think those changes are obvious—but they’re only obvious if you explain them clearly.
By submitting an IDS and showing what you’ve seen, you give yourself a chance to highlight the differences. It’s not about showing the examiner you copied something.
It’s about showing them that you’re aware of what’s out there—and you’ve designed around it in a smart, thoughtful way.
That level of clarity can make your design stand out. It shows you’re not reinventing the wheel—you’re refining it, improving it, making it distinct in a way that matters. And that’s exactly what a design patent is meant to protect.
Not All Prior Art Is Obvious—But You’re Still Responsible
Another common trap: “I didn’t think that counted as prior art.” Founders often miss things because they assume only published patents or technical drawings count.
But prior art for design patents includes any public disclosure—ads, product launches, social media, packaging, videos, photos, even your own website.
If the design has been shown publicly anywhere before your filing date, it’s potentially relevant.
That’s why it’s smart to keep a record of what you’ve seen during your design process. Not just what you researched, but also what came up in your normal product development flow.
A simple screenshot or saved URL can be enough. If you’re using a tool like PowerPatent, you can upload these items straight into your application flow, and a real patent attorney can help you decide what needs to be included.
You don’t have to be perfect. You just have to show you’re being honest and thorough. That’s what the patent office is really looking for.
The Sooner You Include It, the Better It Works
You don’t want to file your application and then scramble to add an IDS later. Technically, you can submit an IDS after filing, but it adds delays and, in some cases, extra fees.
More importantly, it interrupts the flow of the examination. If you wait too long, the examiner may have already made decisions based on incomplete info. That’s not the position you want to be in.
Instead, include what you know as early as possible—ideally when you file. That way, everything gets reviewed together. Your drawings, your claim, your supporting disclosures.
It becomes one clear story about why your design deserves protection.
If your patent gets approved, that early effort pays off in a big way. You’ve built a stronger, more defensible patent—and you’ve done it without unnecessary friction.
What’s Changed Recently—and Why It Matters Now
Most of the rules around design patents and IDS have been consistent for years.
But recently, there have been subtle but important changes in how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) views disclosure obligations for design patents.
These shifts may seem small on paper, but they affect how you prepare and file—and they can influence how much legal strength your patent has later.
If you’re moving fast, building fast, and filing fast, these updates matter more than ever.
Design Patents Are Getting More Attention (and More Scrutiny)
Not long ago, design patents were a bit under the radar. Most startups went after utility patents, thinking they were more powerful.
But in the last few years, design patents have exploded—especially with the rise of physical products, hardware, and user interfaces that win on look and feel.
As more founders turn to design patents, the USPTO is paying closer attention. Examiners are spending more time comparing visual similarities.
Courts are more willing to hear design infringement cases. And in turn, that means the standards for what’s “new” and “non-obvious” in a design have gotten tighter.
This added attention also means examiners are more critical of what’s disclosed in an IDS. They want to see that applicants aren’t just filing quickly—they’re filing thoughtfully.
The USPTO Now Accepts Digital Prior Art More Readily
Here’s one major change: years ago, prior art had to be very formal. It usually meant patents or printed publications.
Now, the USPTO accepts digital prior art more openly—meaning online content, product videos, social media posts, and digital catalogs can count as relevant disclosures.
This matters for startups, because most of what you see today isn’t found in a dusty patent library. It’s on Instagram. It’s on a product hunt page. It’s in a teaser video from a competitor’s launch.
Now that the USPTO recognizes this kind of digital content as prior art, your responsibility to disclose it in an IDS increases. If you’ve seen it and it’s public, you should include it—even if it’s not from a patent database.
The Line Between Utility and Design Is Blurring
Another change is how certain products are now protected by both utility and design patents. That overlap used to be rare. Now, it’s common.
A single invention might have a utility patent for how it works and a design patent for how it looks—filed at the same time.
When that happens, the information shared between applications becomes even more important.
If you file both types of patents, and you find prior art during the utility patent process, that same information might need to be disclosed in the design application’s IDS too.
This is where many startups miss the mark. They treat the two filings as separate. But the USPTO doesn’t see them that way.
They expect your disclosures to be consistent—and that means being strategic and synchronized in how you file.
AI Tools Are Surfacing More Prior Art—Which You Still Have to Disclose
Let’s talk about AI. A lot of startups (especially in the hardware and consumer product space) are using AI tools to help draft their patents, analyze competitors, and search prior art.
That’s smart. But it also means you’re more likely to uncover related designs or similar visuals that the USPTO might consider relevant.
Here’s the catch: if your AI tool finds something and you review it, you’re now aware of it. That means it falls under your disclosure duty.
Even if you didn’t go looking for it manually, the fact that it landed in front of you means it should be disclosed in your IDS.
This is a huge area where startups can slip. If you’re using smart tools to move faster, that’s great—but you also need a process to flag and include anything the tool surfaces that could affect your application.
At PowerPatent, we bake that into the flow. If our system finds prior art or anything you upload looks like something already published, we flag it and make it easy to review and include in your IDS—so you stay compliant without getting bogged down.
The Risk of “Inequitable Conduct” Is Back on the Radar
In legal terms, inequitable conduct is when someone tries to mislead the patent office—usually by leaving out known information.
For years, courts got stricter about proving this, and most people stopped worrying about it. But recently, more cases have shown that courts are taking it seriously again.
Even in design patents, if a competitor can prove you knew about a similar design and chose not to disclose it, they might argue your patent is unenforceable—even if it was granted.
This makes your IDS not just a formality, but a legal shield. You don’t want to risk your entire patent being thrown out just because one screenshot wasn’t included. The smarter move is full transparency, from the start.
Filing Smart Now Avoids Headaches Later
The big takeaway is this: the rules haven’t dramatically changed, but the stakes have. What used to be a quick design filing now sits under more scrutiny.
And the tools you use to move faster—like AI, design libraries, or competitor analysis—can unintentionally raise your obligation to disclose.
Startups that succeed in this environment are the ones that build good habits early. When you treat IDS as part of your creative process—not just legal paperwork—you protect yourself.
You file faster. You avoid costly rejections. And you build patents that hold up in the real world.
What You Still Need to Do (Even If the Rules Feel Looser)
With all the changes around how prior art is treated, how design patents are evaluated, and how AI tools are reshaping search, it might be tempting to think you can ease up on the details.
Maybe skip a step here, round off a corner there. But that’s a dangerous move. Even though the rules might feel more flexible, your responsibilities as an applicant haven’t gone away.
If anything, they’ve become more important. The trick is knowing what still matters—and how to handle it without getting overwhelmed.
You Still Have a Duty to Disclose Known Prior Art
This hasn’t changed. If you know about something that looks similar to your design, or could be used to argue that your design isn’t new, you have to tell the USPTO.
That duty doesn’t expire. It doesn’t get waived just because the design patent process seems shorter or simpler.
What’s different today is how much more visible that knowledge is. You’re likely working in open tools, sharing design iterations online, and using AI-driven search to surface competitors.
All of that increases your awareness. Which increases your duty to disclose.
You don’t need to include everything, but you do need to include anything that seems relevant. If you’d mention it in a product pitch, a design brief, or a team meeting—chances are it’s worth disclosing.
You Still Need to File the IDS Early (Ideally at the Time of Filing)
Some founders think they can wait and see what the examiner finds. Maybe file the IDS later, if it comes up. But that creates delays. And it puts your application at risk of appearing incomplete or inconsistent.
The best time to file the IDS is with your design patent application. That way, everything is on the table up front. The examiner can review your disclosures alongside your design. And if there’s a problem, it’s easier to fix it early.
Filing early also reduces the cost. Submitting an IDS after certain milestones can trigger late fees or even force you to restart parts of the process. It’s a small step that avoids bigger problems down the line.
You Still Need to Connect the Dots for the Examiner
Don’t assume the examiner will see your design and instantly know why it’s different from what you disclosed. That’s not their job.
Their job is to compare and decide whether your design meets the legal standard of being “new” and “not obvious.”
That’s why your IDS isn’t just a dump of links or files. It’s a strategic tool. When you show prior art, you’re also showing contrast. You’re creating space for your design to stand out.
This doesn’t require long explanations. Sometimes a short note or visual annotation is enough.
But without it, the examiner may make the wrong call—and reject your application for being too close to something you could have clearly distinguished.
You Still Need Real Legal Eyes on Your Filing
Even with all the smart tools available today, this part still matters: having a real patent attorney review your application before it goes out. That’s especially true for the IDS.
There are judgment calls involved. Not everything you find needs to be disclosed. But some things definitely do. The risk is in the gray areas—and that’s where legal experience counts.
At PowerPatent, this is baked into the workflow. Our platform helps you collect and organize what you’ve seen, but real patent attorneys review every IDS before it’s filed.
That way, you’re not guessing. You’re filing with confidence.
You Still Need a Simple, Repeatable Process
You’re likely working on more than one design. Or you will be soon. The faster your startup grows, the more IP you’ll want to protect. And that means you can’t afford to treat each filing as a one-off fire drill.
The solution is process. A clear, simple, repeatable way to collect what you see, flag what might be relevant, and include it in your IDS. This could be as easy as taking screenshots during your design research phase.
Or keeping a shared folder for visual references. Or using PowerPatent to automatically prompt you when something looks like prior art.
The goal isn’t to turn this into a legal burden. It’s to make disclosure part of your creative workflow. That’s how you move fast and protect what you build.
How to Stay Fast, Compliant, and Protected Without the Headache
Filing for a design patent shouldn’t slow you down. It should support your momentum. It should be a way to claim your edge in the market—not a maze of forms, rules, and second guesses.
And yet, for a lot of founders, the moment they hear terms like “IDS” or “disclosure,” things grind to a halt. But it doesn’t have to be that way.
There’s a smarter, faster way to do this right—without getting stuck, without missing key steps, and without burning time or budget.
Build Your IP Process Around How You Already Work
Start with what’s natural.
If your team is already doing competitor research, reviewing trends, or collecting inspiration on platforms like Pinterest, Behance, or product blogs—capture that. Don’t add extra steps. Just save what you’re already seeing.
The idea isn’t to do more work. It’s to keep track of what you’re already aware of. That way, when it’s time to file your design patent, you’re not scrambling to remember what you looked at three months ago.
It’s all there. Easy to pull together. Easy to share.
If you use a tool like PowerPatent, you can upload these visuals and links directly as you go. And when it’s time to file, they’re already part of your record. That’s fast. That’s compliant. That’s smart.
Don’t Wait Until Something Goes Wrong
One of the biggest mistakes startups make is waiting for an examiner to push back before they take IDS seriously. But by then, you’re playing catch-up.
You might have to file an RCE (Request for Continued Examination), pay extra fees, or go through another round of review. That slows everything down.
The faster, cleaner path is to lead with what you know. File your IDS with your application. Get ahead of questions. Turn something that feels like a liability into a strength.
That move alone can shave weeks—or even months—off your timeline.
Think About Your Design Patent as a Brand Asset
This isn’t just about legal protection. It’s about building value in your brand.
When you own the visual language of your product—its shape, layout, surface style, and design system—you control more than just the tech. You control the experience.
A clean design patent with a well-structured IDS shows you’re thinking ahead. You’re not just protecting an idea. You’re protecting the emotional connection people have with how your product feels in the world.
That’s not something your competitor can easily copy. That’s a competitive moat—and it starts with getting the small steps right.
You Don’t Need to Be a Lawyer—You Just Need the Right Help
Founders shouldn’t have to master legal jargon to protect what they’re building. You should be able to focus on your product, your customers, and your growth—while knowing your patents are being handled right.
That’s why PowerPatent combines smart software with real attorney oversight. We handle the details. We guide you on what needs to be disclosed.
We review every submission before it goes to the USPTO. So you can file with confidence, without guessing.
When you work with PowerPatent, you’re not just filling out a form. You’re building real IP that stands up, speeds up, and scales with you.
Protect What You’re Building—Before Someone Else Tries to Copy It
The truth is, design matters more than ever. In a crowded market, it’s often the first thing people notice. And if your design is good, someone else will try to mimic it. That’s not paranoia. That’s the reality of moving fast.
The only question is whether you’ll be protected when it happens.
A design patent gives you legal leverage. It gives you the ability to push back. To defend what’s yours. But that only works if your application is clean, complete, and filed the right way—starting with a proper IDS.
So don’t let paperwork slow you down. Don’t let legal confusion keep you exposed. There’s a faster, simpler, smarter way to file—and PowerPatent is here to make it easy.
Wrapping It Up
You’re building something unique. Something that looks better, feels smoother, and stands out in a crowded market. That’s exactly what a design patent is for—to help you own that difference and protect it before someone else tries to ride your wave.
Leave a Reply