You’ve built something smart. A new way to sell, deliver, or create value. Maybe it’s a game-changing platform. Or a clever way to match buyers and sellers. Maybe it’s software that does something no one else thought of. It works. It scales. It grows fast. And now, you’re wondering:
What Does “Patenting a Business Model” Really Mean?
It’s Not What Most People Think
Let’s start with this: a business model, by itself, is just a plan. It’s the “how” behind how your company makes money.
Think Uber. Airbnb. Amazon. Each one has a different way of delivering value and getting paid.
But you can’t just say, “I want to patent the idea of connecting drivers with riders,” and get a patent. That’s too abstract. Too general.
The law doesn’t allow patents on just ideas. You need something more—something real, something specific, something that works in a unique way.
This is where it gets tricky.
Most people think you can’t patent a business model at all. That’s not true. You can, if you frame it right.
But you can’t just protect the money-making plan. You have to focus on how it’s done—especially if there’s tech involved.
And that’s where most founders miss the mark.
The Real Path: Focus on the “How,” Not Just the “What”
Let’s say your startup is doing something fresh.
Maybe you’ve created a platform that matches freelancers with companies in a way that saves time and boosts trust. That’s your model.
But the real protection might come from the method behind it—how your software does the matching, how your scoring algorithm works, how your system filters bad actors.
That’s the secret.
It’s not the business model that gets patented. It’s the system, the process, the machine, the software, the algorithm—the “how.”
And if that “how” is new, useful, and specific? You might have something patentable.
This is why software patents matter. In many cases, your business model is software.
The code, the flow, the logic—it all adds up to a real invention. And if that invention solves a problem in a new way, you’re in good shape.
Why the Grey Area Exists
Here’s the part that throws everyone off: courts, especially in the U.S., are picky about what counts as a real invention.
Back in 2014, there was a big case—Alice v. CLS Bank.
In simple terms, the court said you can’t patent just abstract ideas, even if you use a computer to do it. That case changed everything.
Now, if you want a software or business method patent, you have to show more. You have to prove that your system doesn’t just take an old idea and do it on a computer.
It needs to be new. It needs to solve a real technical problem. It needs to be more than just “do this with software.”
So, when people say “business models can’t be patented,” they’re really talking about that line—between abstract idea and real invention. And that line is grey.
But grey doesn’t mean no. It means careful. Strategic. Thoughtful.
And fast-moving founders can use that to their advantage.
How Startups Are Still Winning Patent Protection
We’ve seen smart founders patent:
- Ways to optimize delivery routes for on-demand services
- Matching systems for marketplaces
- Fraud detection in gig economy platforms
- Pricing models built on real-time data
These aren’t just business models. They’re tech-powered systems that make the model work.
And when they’re new and useful, they get patents.
The key is knowing what to include—and what not to.
That’s why working with people who understand both tech and the patent system is critical. If you just toss a pitch deck to a lawyer, you won’t get far.
But if you can break down your system—how it works under the hood—you’re in the game.
And when you file early, before you launch or share too much, you lock in your edge.
Because if someone copies your model later, and you’ve got a patent on the key parts? You’re protected.
Not in theory. In court.
And even better—in negotiations. Because a patent isn’t just a shield. It’s leverage.
You don’t just want to be first. You want to be protected.
What Makes a Business Method Patentable?
It’s All About Showing the Tech
Okay, let’s get practical. What actually makes a business method patentable?
It’s not about the idea of selling differently or offering something new to a market. That’s great for business.
But not enough for a patent. What you need is to show that your system or method does something technically new and useful.
Let’s unpack that.
If your system relies on a new way to process data, or a specific workflow that creates real-world change, or an algorithm that solves a problem that didn’t have a good solution before—you’re on to something.
The patent office doesn’t care if you’re first to market. They care if your solution is:
- New: No one has done it this way before.
- Useful: It does something real and valuable.
- Specific: It’s not just an idea—it’s a detailed method.
Here’s where founders usually slip: they try to patent the outcome (“we help people rent gear from each other”), not the method (“our system tracks item condition in real time using embedded sensors and dynamic pricing tied to usage patterns”).
The second one has teeth. It shows invention. It shows technical movement.
And that’s what patent examiners—and courts—are looking for.
The Hidden Power of Claim Language
This part gets overlooked, but it’s everything.
When you file a patent, the most important section is the claims. That’s the legal boundary of your protection.
And the way you write those claims can make or break your case.
A claim that says, “A method for connecting users to a service” is going nowhere.
But a claim that says, “A computerized method for dynamically pairing service providers with consumers based on location, time availability, and prior user ratings, using a proprietary matching algorithm…” now you’re cooking.
The more technical and concrete, the stronger your claim.
This is why cookie-cutter patent templates often fail in this space. You need custom language that ties your tech to the business outcome—without sounding like a pitch.
At PowerPatent, we make sure your claims speak the examiner’s language, not just the startup world’s.
Because it’s not just what you invented. It’s how you describe it.
Timing Is Everything
Let’s talk about timing.
One of the biggest mistakes we see is founders waiting too long. They want to “test the market” or “see if it catches on” before thinking about patents.
That’s dangerous.
The moment you show your system to the public—demo day, product launch, a big partnership—you might lose your chance to patent it.
Especially outside the U.S., where “first public disclosure” can block your filing completely.
And even in the U.S., you’ve only got a one-year window after going public. After that? Game over.
So don’t wait until you’ve scaled. File when the idea is still yours. When it’s still quiet. When the system is still under wraps.
That’s when you have power.
That’s when a smart patent becomes your secret weapon.
And here’s the kicker: filing early doesn’t mean you have to slow down.
A provisional patent lets you plant your flag without freezing your momentum. It buys you 12 months to keep building, improving, and refining.
All while locking in your date and your idea.
How the U.S. Views Business Model Patents
The Legal Landscape Is Tricky—But Not Impossible
Let’s zoom in on how the U.S. patent system looks at business models.
After the Alice case, the rules changed. The courts said you can’t patent an “abstract idea” just because you put it on a computer.
That ruling hit business model patents hard. Suddenly, tons of software and financial patents got challenged and even thrown out.
So, does that mean the door is closed?
Not at all.
It just means you have to play smarter.
You need to show that your method is not just an abstract idea. You need to show that it does something real and technical.
You need to show that it improves how a computer works—or how data flows—or how something gets done more efficiently in a digital environment.
That’s the difference between an abstract pitch and a working invention.
What Examiners Look For Now
If you’re filing a patent on your business method, here’s what the patent examiner will look at:
First, they’ll ask: Is this just a business concept in disguise? If the answer is yes, your patent dies right there.
But if you’ve built a specific method—especially one that relies on a machine, or a particular algorithm, or a new system of organizing information—that’s different.
Then they’ll ask: Does this system solve a technical problem in a technical way?
And that’s your chance to shine.
Because if your system, for example, reduces fraud using a new way of tracking behavior, or improves data accuracy using a custom-built scoring model, or boosts delivery efficiency by optimizing routes through a new type of logic—now you’re in the game.
That’s technical. That’s real. That’s patentable.
Real-World Wins: How Founders Are Doing It
Let’s take a look at some startup moves that worked.
One founder built a new kind of loyalty system that adapts rewards based on customer behavior and location.
On paper, it sounds like a marketing plan. But under the hood? It used a proprietary algorithm and a geolocation engine tied to a rules-based engine. That got a patent.
Another startup created a marketplace where service pros compete for jobs—but it used an innovative time-slot allocation method that prevented overlaps and delays. That got a patent too.
Another team developed a finance tool that helped small businesses set prices based on competitor analysis and user behavior.
The magic wasn’t in the pricing concept—it was in how the system pulled in, cleaned, and scored the data in real time.
Again: patent granted.
The takeaway? It’s not about the business model alone. It’s about the engine that powers it.
And if that engine is new, clever, and well-documented, you’ve got a shot.
What About Outside the U.S.?
Global Rules Are Even Stricter—But Still Playable
Let’s say you’re building a global startup. You’re not just thinking about protecting your idea in the U.S.—you want coverage in Europe, Asia, maybe even Australia.
So the big question is: Can you patent your business method overseas?
Short answer: It’s harder. But not impossible.
Different countries look at business model patents differently. Europe, for example, is much stricter.
They don’t allow patents on business methods “as such.” In plain English: if it feels like a business plan and not a tech invention, they’ll reject it fast.
But if your method solves a technical problem—just like in the U.S.—they’ll look at it more closely. The European Patent Office (EPO) will ask:
Does the system do something technical?
Does it make the computer, the network, or the way data flows actually better?
If your system is just “doing business,” no dice.
But if you’ve built something that improves how machines or systems work, even if it supports a business model, then you’ve got a path.
Asia’s a mixed bag. China and Japan, for instance, are starting to warm up to software and internet-based patents—but they also want to see technical depth.
In other words: fluff gets you nowhere. Specifics open doors.
That’s why the way you write your patent matters so much. The same invention, written vaguely, will be rejected everywhere.
But written clearly and technically? It might sail through.
And that’s why founders working with experienced patent teams—who understand both software and global rules—win where others get stuck.
Strategic Filing: Where and When to File
If your business model has global potential, you don’t need to file everywhere at once. That’s expensive and often unnecessary.
Instead, smart founders start with a U.S. provisional patent. This locks in your idea and gives you 12 months to test, refine, and decide where to expand.
If your startup gains traction and you’re seeing interest overseas, you can file an international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
This doesn’t give you a patent right away, but it keeps your options open in over 150 countries while you build and fundraise.
It’s like putting a “coming soon” sign in all the key markets.
Then, as you grow, you can convert that international application into real patents in places that matter most—like the U.S., Europe, Japan, China, and others.
And here’s the secret: if your patent is written the right way from the start, adapting it for those countries becomes way easier.
What You Should Never Do When Trying to Patent a Business Model
Don’t Try to Patent the “Idea” Alone
This is the most common mistake by far: trying to protect the big idea instead of the way it’s built.
You can’t just say, “We’ve got a new way to deliver groceries faster.” That’s not patentable. That’s a goal, not an invention.
Even saying, “We connect users through an app,” won’t get you there. That’s too generic.
You need to focus on what you built that others haven’t. Maybe it’s a routing algorithm that adapts in real time. Maybe it’s a way to batch orders based on neighborhood density and vehicle type.
Maybe it’s a custom decision tree that schedules pickups more efficiently than anything else out there.
That’s the level of detail that matters.
Because patents don’t protect dreams. They protect systems.
Don’t Wait Too Long
The second big mistake is waiting.
We get it. You’re in build mode. You’re launching, pitching, iterating. Filing a patent feels like something you can do later.
But later might be too late.
Once your idea is out in the wild—especially in a pitch deck or a demo—it’s fair game for others. And in most countries, if you haven’t filed yet, you’ve lost the right to ever patent it.
Even in the U.S., where you get a one-year grace period after public disclosure, it’s a dangerous clock to play with.
Founders who file early don’t just protect their ideas—they sleep better. They can share with confidence. They can pitch without paranoia.
And they stay ahead of copycats.
Don’t Use Cookie-Cutter Templates
There are lots of “easy patent filing” tools out there. But when it comes to business models and software systems, shortcuts won’t cut it.
Generic templates won’t capture the nuance of your system. They won’t frame your tech the right way.
And they almost never stand up to examiners or investors who ask the tough questions.
If you’re going to spend time filing a patent, make it count. Make sure it actually protects what matters most: the engine that makes your startup go.
That’s why we built PowerPatent—to help founders file smarter, faster, and with real legal muscle behind every move.
We combine smart software and real attorneys to guide you step by step. You don’t need to speak legalese. You just need to know your system. We’ll help with the rest.
How to Frame Your Business Model for Patent Success
Start With the System, Not the Market
When you’re writing or thinking about your patent, don’t start with your customers. Start with your engine.
Forget for a moment who uses your platform or how you’re going to monetize it. Instead, look at the mechanics. Ask yourself:
What is the machine behind this?
What’s happening under the hood that makes this work?
Maybe you’ve got a platform that connects local service providers to customers faster than ever. Great.
But don’t try to patent the connection. Instead, look at the logic that powers the match.
Is there a new way you’re ranking providers? A system for balancing location, availability, and user preferences? That’s what can be protected.
When you lead with the technical side—how your model works rather than what it does—you’re speaking the patent office’s language.
And that’s what gets results.
Break Down the Flow
It helps to map out how your system works from end to end.
Think like a flowchart. What happens first, next, and after that? Where does the decision-making happen? Where is data used in a new way?
This helps uncover the real value. Because often, your innovation isn’t in just one part of the system—it’s in how all the parts fit together.
Maybe the way you combine data points, automate actions, or optimize tasks is what makes your model powerful.
Don’t worry if you’re not sure how to describe it “right.” Just describe it honestly and clearly. That’s what great patent drafters can work with.
And at PowerPatent, we help translate your tech into patent language that sticks—without losing what makes it special.
Think Like a Hacker (But the Good Kind)
If someone wanted to copy what you built—without using your brand or your UI—what would they have to rebuild?
That’s what you want to protect.
Because that’s where the value lives.
That’s what makes your system more than just a website or an app. It’s a working machine. A method. A real asset.
The best business model patents don’t just describe the user-facing experience. They focus on the structure that makes the experience possible.
And when you lock that down, you’ve done more than protect an idea—you’ve claimed real ground.
What Happens After You File
The Patent Office Will Push Back—And That’s Normal
So you’ve filed your patent. You’ve explained your system. You’ve broken down the logic. What happens now?
First, your application gets assigned to a patent examiner—someone who reviews inventions like yours for a living. They’ll read your claims, look at your diagrams, and compare it to existing patents and known systems.
Then, most likely, they’ll push back.
Don’t panic. That’s part of the process. In fact, almost every software or business method patent gets rejected at least once at first.
The examiner might say it’s not “novel” or not “patent eligible.” This is called an Office Action.
Here’s the thing: it’s not a final “no.” It’s a chance to respond.
Your team (hopefully with the help of an experienced attorney or patent expert) will argue your case.
They’ll clarify language, point to what makes your system unique, and explain why the examiner’s comparison misses the mark.
And that’s where the real patent skill shows up.
If your original filing is strong, these responses are easier. You don’t have to add new stuff—you just need to highlight what’s already there in a sharper way.
Often, one or two responses is all it takes to get your patent allowed.
The End Goal: A Patent That Actually Protects
When your patent gets granted, it’s not just a certificate to hang on the wall. It’s legal power.
You can stop competitors who try to use your system without permission.
You can show it to investors and partners as proof that your idea isn’t just cool—it’s defensible.
You can even license parts of it if your method becomes valuable to others in your space.
And most importantly, you can build your startup with more confidence—knowing the thing that makes your business tick is legally protected.
That’s a big deal.
In a world where good ideas get copied fast, a smart patent is a moat. It’s not about lawsuits. It’s about leverage. It’s about negotiating from strength.
And it starts by filing the right way, at the right time.
Wrapping It Up
If you’re a founder, engineer, or builder creating something new—a better way to connect people, a smarter way to sell, a more efficient way to deliver—you’re probably sitting on more than just a product. You’re building a system. A machine. A method.
Leave a Reply