You’re building something big, something new—and you want to protect it. So, like any smart founder, you start with a patent search. You look around the landscape to see what’s already out there. Who’s filed what. Where you stand. But here’s where things go sideways for a lot of startups: they stop there. They think the search is enough. It’s not.
Why a Patent Search Isn’t Enough (And What Happens If You Stop There)
Most startups believe they’re doing the right thing by running a patent search. It’s the first logical step when you’re building something new.
You want to know what’s out there, who your competitors are, and whether your invention might bump into something that’s already been claimed.
This early search feels like progress—and it is—but stopping there is where real problems start. Because a search, by itself, is only information. What matters next is what you do with that information.
The Search Is Just Step One in a Much Bigger Picture
A landscape search gives you visibility. It’s like turning on the lights in a dark room. But turning on the lights doesn’t get you out of the room—it just helps you see where to go next.
That’s what the IDS is: it’s the action you take with what you see. Without that step, your search has no legal weight. It’s just data sitting on a shelf.
And if you don’t properly disclose that data to the USPTO when you file your patent, it can come back to hurt you later.
Why the USPTO Needs to Know What You Know
The patent system works on good faith. When you file, you’re telling the government: “Here’s my invention, and here’s everything I know that might be relevant.” That second part—the disclosure—isn’t optional.
The USPTO expects you to hand over any prior art or documents that could impact how they judge your invention. And yes, that includes everything you found during your own search.
If you found it, they expect you to disclose it. Even if it’s not exactly the same as your idea. Even if you think it’s not a big deal. Holding back can kill your patent later. Disclose it now, and you stay on the safe side.
Skipping the IDS Can Lead to Invalid Patents
Here’s the scary part: if you don’t file an IDS correctly—or if you leave out relevant information—the USPTO can later declare your patent invalid.
That means you could spend years building a company around an invention that isn’t legally protected.
Worse, if someone sues you for infringement or challenges your patent, your own failure to disclose prior art can be used against you. And in court, that’s hard to come back from.
It’s not about intent. It’s about whether you followed the rules. That’s why getting this step right matters so much, especially for startups where every piece of IP is high-stakes.
How the Best Founders Turn Search Into Leverage
Smart founders don’t just do a search to “check a box.” They use it as leverage. They treat every document they find as an opportunity.
If something similar exists, they use that insight to sharpen their claims—to make their invention stand out more clearly.
If nothing close shows up, they use that to reinforce how novel their solution really is. And in both cases, they take those insights and include them in their IDS.
That shows the USPTO they’re playing above board. And that kind of transparency builds trust—which helps patents move faster through the system.
Making Compliance Part of Your Workflow
The key is to treat the IDS as part of your process from day one. Not an afterthought. Not something you rush right before filing. But something you plan for as you gather information.
When you review prior art, save what you find. Keep notes.
Track sources. Use tools that let you flag references for easy submission later. That way, when it’s time to file, your IDS isn’t a scramble—it’s already half done.
This is where software can be your best friend. Automating this part of the workflow means nothing slips through the cracks—and you’re always ready to submit clean, compliant docs when it counts.
What Is an IDS and Why the USPTO Actually Cares
If the idea of an IDS sounds dry or overly technical, you’re not alone. Most founders hear “Information Disclosure Statement” and immediately tune out.
But this step might be the most important thing you do after your patent search.
It’s not just paperwork. It’s your signal to the USPTO that you’ve done your homework—and that you’re playing by the rules. And when done right, it can actually speed up your patent review and strengthen your legal position.
An IDS Is Just You Telling the USPTO What You Found
Let’s simplify it. An IDS is a document you submit to the USPTO that lists all the prior art or references you know about that might be relevant to your invention.
That’s it. You’re not analyzing them. You’re not making arguments. You’re just disclosing. If you found a paper, a patent, a product, or even a blog post that’s close to your invention—you include it.
The USPTO takes that info and uses it to assess your claims fairly. They want to know what else is out there so they can judge whether your invention is truly new and non-obvious.
It’s Not Optional—It’s Legally Required
Some founders think of the IDS as a “nice-to-have.” It’s not. Under U.S. patent law, you have a duty to disclose anything you know that could be material to your invention.
If you’ve done a search—even a basic one—and you found related patents or documents, those are material. If you don’t disclose them, that can be seen as withholding information.
And that can lead to the dreaded “inequitable conduct” claim down the road. That’s legal-speak for: your patent could be thrown out because you weren’t honest or complete in your disclosure.
The IDS Helps You Stay Ahead of Surprises
When you file an IDS, you’re not just checking a compliance box—you’re controlling the narrative. You’re putting everything on the table before someone else does.
And that matters, especially when your patent gets examined. If the USPTO finds something you didn’t disclose but should have, that’s a red flag.
But if you disclosed it yourself, you show that you were transparent from day one. That takes the sting out of prior art. It also gives you a chance to explain how your invention is different—before the examiner brings it up.
IDS Submissions Can Also Build Examiner Trust
Patent examiners see a lot of filings. When they see a thorough IDS, it tells them something important: this inventor did their homework. That can shift the tone of the entire review.
Instead of feeling like they have to dig for hidden issues, the examiner knows you’ve already done the digging. You’ve laid out the facts.
That transparency builds trust, and that trust can lead to faster, smoother prosecution. In other words, a clean IDS isn’t just about compliance—it’s about giving your patent the best shot at success.
Filing an IDS Isn’t Hard, But Doing It Late Can Hurt
You can file an IDS anytime before your patent is allowed—but earlier is always better. Waiting until the last minute creates risk. If you delay and then discover new art after allowance, things get messy.
You may need to reopen prosecution or pay additional fees. And worse, if someone challenges your patent later, they can point to that delay as a weakness.
That’s why founders who build this into their early workflow are always ahead. They don’t scramble. They don’t miss deadlines. They just file strong, clean patents.
From Search Results to Submission: The Real-World Workflow
So you’ve done the search. You’ve got a stack of links, documents, and references. Now what? This is where most teams freeze.
They don’t know how to move from “I found this online” to “This is ready for the USPTO.” But making that leap doesn’t have to be complicated.
It just needs a system—a way to go from messy results to a clean, compliant Information Disclosure Statement. Let’s break down what that looks like in practice.
Treat Your Search Like a Source of Truth, Not a Throwaway Task
First, stop thinking of the patent search as a checkbox. It’s not just for your own peace of mind—it’s a critical legal record. Everything you find could matter later. So treat those results like gold.
Save them somewhere organized. If your team uses tools like Google Patents, Espacenet, or PowerPatent’s built-in search, make sure you’re not just clicking around. Take notes.
Save links. Download PDFs. Document the dates. That record becomes the foundation for your IDS—and for defending your patent later if needed.
Use Relevance, Not Volume, to Decide What to Include
One common mistake is overloading the IDS with every single document found in a search. But more isn’t always better. You don’t need to include unrelated materials just to be safe.
Instead, focus on what’s material. If a reference discusses something close to your claims—same field, similar function, overlapping elements—it probably belongs in the IDS.
If it’s way outside your invention or clearly irrelevant, you can usually skip it. The goal is to be thorough but targeted. Think quality over quantity.
Keep Track of Who Found What and When
If you’re working with co-founders, outside counsel, or a software tool, make sure everyone’s discoveries are documented. The USPTO doesn’t just care about what you found—they care about when you found it.
Timing matters. If you learn something new after filing but before your patent is granted, you still have a duty to disclose. That means your tracking system needs to be time-stamped and reliable.
A shared spreadsheet is better than nothing. But modern patent tools like PowerPatent do this automatically—no manual logging needed.
Turn Your Findings into a Proper IDS Form
Now comes the paperwork. The USPTO requires that all IDS submissions follow a specific format—usually using Form SB/08A. This isn’t something you want to freestyle.
The form asks for things like publication numbers, dates, document types, and who submitted them. You can’t just say, “Here’s a Google link.” It needs to be precise and properly filled out.
If this sounds tedious, it kind of is—but this is where tools can help. PowerPatent, for example, lets you generate a fully compliant IDS in minutes, straight from your search results.
Submit Early, Not at the Last Minute
Once your IDS is filled out, it’s time to file it with your patent application or shortly after. The earlier, the better. If you wait too long, things get risky. You might need to pay extra fees.
Worse, you could end up reopening prosecution. Filing early not only keeps you safe—it sends a signal to the USPTO that you’re on top of things. You’re not hiding anything.
You’re building a patent the right way, from the ground up.
Avoiding the Common Mistakes That Can Sink Your Patent
Filing a patent isn’t just about having a good idea. It’s about doing the little things right—especially when it comes to your search and disclosure process.
You can have a breakthrough invention, but if you skip steps or make mistakes in how you handle prior art, your patent can still be challenged, delayed, or even thrown out.
That’s why it’s important to know where founders often slip—and how to avoid those traps from the start.
Thinking the USPTO Will Do All the Searching for You
A lot of teams assume the patent office will do all the digging. That’s true—they will do their own search. But they also expect you to tell them what you already know. You’re not off the hook.
The USPTO doesn’t want to chase down every piece of art you found. If you’ve reviewed something relevant, they expect you to include it. The examiner will consider what you submit, and that gives you more control.
If you skip this step, you’re not just being lazy—you’re putting your patent at risk.
Forgetting That Intent Doesn’t Always Matter
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: even if you didn’t mean to leave something out, you can still be penalized for it. In patent law, it’s not just about what you intended—it’s about what you did.
If a competitor later proves that you knew about a piece of prior art and didn’t disclose it, your patent could be invalidated. It doesn’t matter whether it was a mistake or a deliberate choice.
That’s why it’s safer to disclose too much than too little, as long as it’s relevant.
Misjudging What Counts as Prior Art
It’s easy to assume that only granted patents count as prior art. Not true. Patent applications, academic papers, public demos, product pages, technical blogs—even YouTube videos—can all qualify.
If someone else publicly shared an idea before your filing date, and it’s close to yours, it counts. That’s why modern patent search tools look beyond just patents.
And that’s why you need to think broadly about what you include in your IDS. The goal isn’t to flood the USPTO with junk. It’s to be honest about what’s out there.
Leaving Everything to the Last Minute
Rushing is the enemy of quality. It’s tempting to cram the IDS into the last day of filing. But that’s where most of the worst errors happen—missing documents, incorrect formats, wrong reference numbers.
Filing a rushed or incomplete IDS creates more work later. Worse, it can delay your application. If your IDS isn’t filed in time, you may need to reopen examination, pay fees, or correct the record.
All of this costs you time and momentum. Instead, bake the IDS process into your early patent workflow so it’s not an afterthought.
Assuming Your Attorney Will Handle It All
Even if you’re working with a great attorney, you still have a role to play. Your attorney can’t read your mind. They rely on you to flag the right references, share what you’ve seen, and explain what matters.
If you don’t give them that context, they might miss key documents—or over-disclose and bloat the IDS. The best founders collaborate. They use tools to track references, annotate documents, and share their thinking.
That makes their attorneys more effective, and the final submission cleaner and stronger.
How to Automate the IDS Process Without Missing a Thing
Filing an IDS doesn’t have to be manual, messy, or painful.
If you’re still copying links into spreadsheets, manually filling out forms, or emailing PDFs back and forth with your attorney, you’re spending time on tasks that should be automatic.
The truth is, most of the friction in the IDS process comes from old tools and outdated workflows. But with the right setup, this part of your patent strategy can run quietly in the background—accurate, complete, and always ready.
Start With a Search Tool That Tracks What You Find
If your patent search tool doesn’t let you save, tag, and export your results, it’s costing you time. The moment you find something that looks close, you should be able to flag it with a click and know it’s stored for later.
PowerPatent does this natively. It automatically records every piece of prior art you review, organizes it by relevance, and keeps it tied to your invention.
That way, you don’t have to scramble later to remember what you saw or where you found it.
Auto-Generate Compliant IDS Forms With One Click
Once your prior art is collected, the next step is formatting. This is where founders often hit a wall.
Manually filling out Form SB/08A can be a nightmare—especially if you’re trying to include dozens of documents. But automation changes everything.
PowerPatent lets you generate a fully formatted, USPTO-compliant IDS from your saved search results. It fills in publication numbers, authors, dates, and sources for you. You just review and file. No errors. No stress.
Keep Your Disclosure Up to Date as You Learn More
You don’t just file one IDS and walk away. If you continue working on your invention, talking to investors, or checking out the competition, you’re likely to come across more prior art.
That means your IDS might need an update. With automated tracking, you can add new references to your disclosure without starting from scratch. And when it’s time to file again, everything’s ready.
This kind of live system helps founders stay compliant without having to remember every detail manually.
Get Attorney Oversight Without Slowing Down
Even with automation, you still want human review—especially for something as high-stakes as a patent. PowerPatent combines software with real attorney oversight.
So when your IDS is generated, an experienced patent lawyer checks it, ensures compliance, and catches anything software might miss. You move faster, stay protected, and don’t have to second-guess your submission.
Own Your Workflow Without Losing Control
The best part of automating your IDS process? You stay in the driver’s seat. You control what gets disclosed. You see exactly what’s being filed. You decide when to submit.
But you’re not stuck doing busywork or chasing down paperwork. You get all the benefits of speed and confidence—without the headaches of traditional patent filing.
Wrapping It Up
You’re already doing the hard part—building something new, solving a real problem, and looking ahead. But when it comes to patents, it’s not just about the invention. It’s about showing your work. Showing the USPTO that you’ve done your homework, played fair, and disclosed what you found.
Leave a Reply