Tag: Patent Workflow Automation

So you’ve been working on your patent. You filed it. You got that first Office Action. You replied. And then… you got a Final Rejection. Oof. Now what? That’s the moment many founders and inventors hit a wall. You’re building something real. You want to protect it. But now the patent office is saying “No.”…

Let’s be honest. Patents are hard. They take time. They feel slow. And sometimes, even after you’ve explained your invention in plain English and sent over every detail you can think of, the patent examiner still pushes back. You get an office action. Then maybe another. Suddenly, the whole thing feels stuck. What Most Founders…

You filed a patent. Great. But now comes the part no one tells you enough about—the pushback. The USPTO comes back with questions. Concerns. Rejections. It’s called an “Office Action.” And when that happens, you’ve got two options: fix it or fight it. Amend the claims or argue your position. What’s Really Going On in…

You’ve probably heard it before: getting a patent approved can feel like a black box. You submit your application, wait, and hope for the best. But behind the scenes, there’s a person who plays a major role in your success—the patent examiner. And the better you understand them, the better your odds. Understanding Examiner Behavior…

Most patent teams are flying blind. Every time a new patent examiner comes up, it’s like starting from scratch. You’re guessing what they’ll allow, what they hate, how they think. And that guessing game? It wastes time, burns money, and drags out the process. What Is an Examiner Knowledge Base—and Why Most Firms Don’t Have…

If you’re reading this, there’s a good chance your patent got hit with something called a 101 rejection. Or maybe you’re just trying to avoid it. Either way, you’re in the right place. Here’s the deal. Most smart inventors and founders don’t expect to get a 101 rejection. Especially if what they’ve built is actually…

If you’re building something real—writing code, training models, designing systems—you want to protect it. You want to own it. That’s what patents are for. But if your tech touches software, data, or algorithms, you’ve probably heard of Alice. Or maybe you’ve been hit with a rejection under it. What “Practical Application” Actually Means (And Why…

If you’re building something new—something that uses code, AI, or any kind of tech—you’ve probably heard this before: “Your patent might not survive a 101 challenge.” That sentence can stop your momentum fast. It sounds like legal doom. And the truth is, Section 101 of the patent law (the one that says your invention must…

You’ve built something new. Something that solves a real problem. You’re moving fast, talking to users, shipping updates, maybe even raising a round. Then the USPTO sends back a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Your patent application is getting blocked because they say your invention isn’t “eligible.” You hit a wall. What is a…

You’ve come up with something new. You know it’s valuable. You’re ready to protect it. But suddenly, the patent examiner pushes back. They say your idea isn’t new. They point to something already out there—a patent, a paper, a product. They call it a “102 rejection.” They say it anticipates your invention. And just like…