Tag: Patent Workflow Automation
-

Non-Enabling Prior Art: Turn a 102 Rejection on Its Head
So you got a 102 rejection. That dreaded letter from the USPTO saying your invention isn’t new. Your stomach sinks. You think, “Did someone already beat me to it?” And suddenly, all the excitement about your idea starts to fade. What Is Non-Enabling Prior Art (And Why It Matters)? Understanding the Business Risk Behind It…
-

Hidden Assumptions in 102: Attack Inherency the Right Way
You’ve probably heard it before. “Your invention isn’t new. It’s already out there.” That’s what 102 rejections are all about. The USPTO is saying your idea was already known or used by someone else before you filed your patent. But what if that’s not really true? What Inherency Really Means (And Why It’s So Dangerous)…
-

AI Forecasts: Likely Rejections and Best Responses
If you’re building something new, chances are you’ve thought about patents. Or maybe you haven’t, because just the thought of filing one sounds like a total mess. Too slow. Too expensive. Too many unknowns. And what if it gets rejected after months of waiting? The Hidden Game Inside Patent Rejections It’s not just about the…
-

Docket Load & Backlog: Timing Your Moves
Every founder, engineer, or inventor building something new has a clock ticking. But it’s not just the product roadmap or your next funding round. There’s another silent timer running in the background: your patent docket. And if you don’t understand how it works—or worse, ignore it—you might end up stuck, late, or blocked from protecting…
-

Restriction Requirements: Which Examiners Pull Them
If you’re building something new—code, hardware, AI models, anything—you already have enough on your plate. You’re moving fast, breaking things, fixing them again. The last thing you want is a surprise delay from the patent office. But it happens. One common curveball? Something called a restriction requirement. It sounds small. But it can slow you…
-

Map Prior-Art Preferences by Examiner
Getting a patent approved isn’t just about having a great invention. It’s also about knowing how to navigate the system—especially when it comes to the examiner reviewing your application. Understanding the Hidden Power of Examiner Behavior Every Examiner is Different. That’s Not a Problem—It’s an Opportunity. Here’s something most founders don’t realize: your patent application…
-

Interview Summaries That Persuade (and Protect the Record)
If you’re building something new—software, hardware, AI, biotech, anything that pushes boundaries—your ideas are everything. They’re what give your startup a shot. They’re what attract funding, users, and talent. They’re also what others might try to copy, twist, or claim as their own. Start with What Matters Most Don’t just capture what was said—capture what…
-

Continuations to Friendlier Art Units: Data-Driven Tactics
If you’re a founder or engineer trying to patent your tech, here’s something you probably don’t know: where your patent application lands inside the USPTO can make or break your success. What is a Continuation—and Why Should You Care? It’s not just a follow-up—it’s your chance to play smarter A continuation isn’t just a formality.…
-

Winning 101 via Interviews: Framing “Practical Application”
Let’s keep this simple. If you’re building something new—whether it’s a breakthrough in AI, robotics, biotech, or just a smart way to solve a real problem—what you’re creating only matters if it actually works in the real world. How Interviews Can Flip the Script The One Thing Founders Miss About Patents Most founders think patents…
-

Pre-Appeal Brief Conferences: Who Grants and Why
Filing a patent is already a journey. You’ve built something real. You’ve invested time and energy. You’ve gone through the application process. And then you hit a wall. The examiner rejects your application. Maybe more than once. Now what?You could appeal. But appeals can take years. They can cost a fortune. And worst of all,…