Author: Aindrila Mitra
-

Black-and-White vs Color Figures: What to Choose
Sometimes the simplest choices end up shaping how strong your patent becomes. One of those small-but-mighty choices is deciding whether your figures should be in black-and-white or in color. It sounds tiny. It feels like it shouldn’t matter. But it does—especially when you’re a fast-moving founder trying to get real protection without slowing down. Why…
-

Drawing Rules for Design Patents: A Clear Checklist
Design patents look simple on the surface. You show what your product looks like, the USPTO reviews it, and you get protection. Easy, right? But the truth is a little trickier. The drawings in a design patent are the whole heart of the filing. They decide what you actually own, how strong your protection is,…
-

Broken Lines Explained: Claim More with Less
Most founders think patent drawings are just pictures. They’re not. They’re quiet weapons. One small detail in a drawing can shrink or stretch the power of your patent. And one of the simplest tools—something most people overlook—is the broken line. What Broken Lines Really Mean in a Patent Drawing Broken lines look simple, but they…
-

How to Scope a Design Patent: Whole Product vs Parts
When founders think about patents, most picture big technical documents full of diagrams and long claims. But design patents work in a very different way. They’re all about how something looks, not how it works. And when you file one, you face an important choice right away: should you protect the whole product, or should…
-

Design vs Utility Patents: Which One Fits Your Product
When you’re building something new, you’re moving fast. You’re sketching, testing, fixing, and pushing out updates before anyone else can catch up. But at some point, you realize something important: if you don’t protect what you’re building, someone else can copy it. And they can move just as fast as you—or faster. That’s usually the…
-

Design Patents 101: What They Protect (and Don’t)
Most founders don’t think about design patents until it’s too late. They’re busy building, shipping, fixing bugs, talking to users, raising money, and trying to stay a few steps ahead of copycats. But the truth is simple: if your product has a unique look—and that look gives it value—you can lose a lot if someone…
-

National Phase Playbook: A Step-by-Step Plan from PCT to Grant
Going from a PCT filing to getting patents granted in different countries can feel like you’re walking into a maze with no map. Every country has its own rules, timelines, and small details that can trip you up. And when you’re building a startup, the last thing you want is a slow or messy patent…
-

Post-Grant View: Annuities, Oppositions, and Enforcement by Region
After a patent is granted, the real work starts. Most founders don’t hear this enough. You finally get that patent number, you feel the win, and then you realize something new: keeping a patent alive and strong is an ongoing game. You need to pay the right fees on time. You need to watch for…
-

Using PatentScope: Find Prior Art and Competitor Families
It’s easy to feel lost when you’re trying to figure out what already exists in the world of patents. You might hear people talk about “prior art” or “patent families,” and it can sound like a maze. But once you know how to use PatentScope the right way, you’ll see it’s actually a powerful tool…
-

Deadlines That Matter: 30 vs 31 Months and Local Extensions
Sometimes the smallest deadlines turn into the biggest problems. If you’ve ever tried to juggle patents while building a startup, you already know this. There’s one set of deadlines in particular that catches founders off guard: the 30-month and 31-month national phase entry deadlines under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, plus the strange, uneven world of…